[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks to Steven Hansen there are now OSX buildbots in the stable list. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: -> feature request ___ Python tracker

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > Buildbot failure reports are sent to python-checkins. In theory, at > least; I think that isn't working very well. ISTR we disabled them because there was too much churn from both unreliable buildbots and unreliable tests, which made the noise annoying and u

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Is is possible to get e-mail about changes of buildbot status? I'd be > interested in two sets of mail: any buildbot failures caused by my > checkins and state changes for the OSX buildbots. Buildbot failure reports are sent to python-checkins. In theory, at

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: Martin: sorry about my first question. My interpretation of your first message was that you thought that the OSX port itself wasn't stable, and you've already mentioned that you didn't mean to imply that. I'm unassigning the issue from my as I won't be able

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > I think it's just as reasonable to say that the developers making > changes just aren't aware of bad side-effects on OS X. A good way to > remedy that would be to make those bad side-effects more apparent, for > example by adding an OS X buildbot into the "s

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

R. David Murray added the comment: Data point: on #python-dev we get announcements when buildbots (any buildbots, not just stable ones) *change state*. That is, when a buildbot that was passing fails, or a buildbot that was failing passes. We do look at the failures, though not all the time

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Changes by Alexander Belopolsky : -- assignee: -> ronaldoussoren components: +Macintosh -None ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-l

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Bit of a chicken/egg issue here. Since we haven't had OS X buildbots > for very long, and the ones we do have represent odd configurations, > I think it's premature to say that "the port *doesn't* pass the test > suite on a regular manner". And I didn't mea

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Changes by Shashwat Anand : -- nosy: +l0nwlf ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Bill Janssen added the comment: Bit of a chicken/egg issue here. Since we haven't had OS X buildbots for very long, and the ones we do have represent odd configurations, I think it's premature to say that "the port *doesn't* pass the test suite on a regular manner". I think it's just as reas

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Am 22.06.2010 12:40, schrieb Ronald Oussoren: > > Ronald Oussoren added the comment: > > Then why bother providing binaries? How is that related? There was no OSX build slave until very recently, but binaries had been provided for years. I see no reason to st

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +merwok ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: Then why bother providing binaries? I'm trying to keep the OSX port in good shape, but at times have to hunt down issues that were introduced by other bugfixes. A problem with adding OSX to the list of stable buildbots is IMHO that there seem to be very few

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: "stable" is also meant to mean "typically passes test suite without errors". I don't think OSX meets this criterion. -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker _

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

Changes by Bill Janssen : -- components: +None keywords: +buildbot versions: -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue9048] no OS X buildbots in the stable list

New submission from Bill Janssen : Considering the number of OS X machines running Python programs, it would be good idea to get this platform into the "stable" list of buildbots so that releases are checked against it. -- messages: 108302 nosy: janssen priority: normal severity: norma