[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Changes by Martin Panter : -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Senthil Kumaran/orsenthil can you pick this up as implied in msg107919? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo added the comment: I’m sorry to have launched this thread. I hadn’t thought that Senthil is doing a lot of good work on HTTP and URI-related modules, and I wanted to express my feeling that this bug would not get fixed without someone proposing a patch. I didn’t want to imply that th

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Le jeudi 17 juin 2010 à 13:22 +, anatoly techtonik a écrit : > > > That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even > > desireable. Chances are you are going to have to implement them yourself > > if you really want them. In any case

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

anatoly techtonik added the comment: > That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even > desireable. Chances are you are going to have to implement them yourself > if you really want them. In any case, just complaining won't change > anything. I am just trying to answer

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > pbranch is the next in my list, still do not have time to dig all these tools. > For now I have these unsolved workflow problems: > [...] That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even desireable. Chances are you are going to have to

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

anatoly techtonik added the comment: >> Conflict resolution takes a lot of time >> and I can't afford maintaining a separate copy of Python checkout for >> every patch > > Then try various hg features such as named branches, or bookmarks, or mq, or > pbranch, etc. > (or any SVN-facing tool you

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > Conflict resolution takes a lot of time > and I can't afford maintaining a separate copy of Python checkout for > every patch Then try various hg features such as named branches, or bookmarks, or mq, or pbranch, etc. (or any SVN-facing tool you would like, i

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

anatoly techtonik added the comment: > I suspect this bug will sit here languishing without action, for various > reasons: I suspect this kind of discussions piss off readers of tickets, but I'll continue, as I do not see any other useful public medium at hand right now. -- start offtopic --

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo added the comment: Sorry, somehow I forgot the ton of work you’ve been putting into urlparse and urllib :) Note that I never said or thought it was an invalid request. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:16:38PM +, Éric Araujo wrote: > Forgot the conclusion: I suspect noone will want to work on that. Nope, please don't come to that conclusion soon. It is a valid request. It is not that only maintainers listed will work on those.

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo added the comment: Forgot the conclusion: I suspect noone will want to work on that. (I removed 2.7 since it’s feature frozen.) -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo added the comment: I suspect this bug will sit here languishing without action, for various reasons: 1) From other doc discussion, I assume you won’t be able to propose a patch. 2) There is no dedicated maintainer for http or cgi. 3) CGI is a low-level, archaic, inefficient inter

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

New submission from anatoly techtonik : CGIHTTPServer should support all CGI scripts, not only Python ones. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 107912 nosy: techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts versions: Python