[issue8736] *= is undocumented for lists

Daniel Stutzbach added the comment: Good point, since I see now that *= (and +=) also works on immutable sequence types (though does something subtly different). I always forget that. -- resolution: -> invalid stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed _

[issue8736] *= is undocumented for lists

New submission from Ray.Allen : Does *= need document? I think the documentation of * for all sequence type can already cover the *= usage. -- nosy: +ysj.ray ___ Python tracker _

[issue8736] *= is undocumented for lists

Changes by Daniel Stutzbach : -- assignee: stutzbach components: Documentation keywords: easy nosy: stutzbach priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: *= is undocumented for lists versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2 ___ Py