[issue8465] re: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved

R. David Murray added the comment: I agree with Terry. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: -> out of date stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker __

[issue8465] re: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: If you are suggesting that code like >>> '\2' '\x02' should routinely product a warning, and later an exception, this issue should be rejected. Normal code does not produce warnings. Rarity in the stdlib is irrelevant. Backslash processing of string literals i

[issue8465] re: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: -pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python

[issue8465] re: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Not sure why this was assigned to me. -- assignee: pitrou -> ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue8465] re: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved

Changes by STINNER Victor : -- title: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved -> re: Backreferences vs. escapes: a silent failure solved ___ Python tracker ___ __