[issue722647] lower-level API for longs

2009-02-10 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson added the comment: Closing. -- resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue722647] lower-level API for longs

2009-02-10 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson added the comment: I recommend closing this due to lack of interest/PEP/patch. 2.7 and 3.1 now have n.bit_length(), which matches Gregory's proposed n.bitwid(). I'm semi-interested in the bit-access methods n.bit(x) and n.bit(hi, lo), but not enough to write a PEP or patch rig

[issue722647] lower-level API for longs

2008-02-26 Thread Facundo Batista
Facundo Batista added the comment: Gregory, you're keeping this as a recordatory (it passed almost five years and a lot of water under "long" bridge), or can be closed? Thank you! -- nosy: +facundobatista Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>