[issue6491] Improve --with-dbmliborder option

2010-01-01 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Applied in r77215. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue6491] Improve --with-dbmliborder option

2009-07-20 Thread djc
Changes by djc : -- nosy: +djc ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/op

[issue6491] Improve --with-dbmliborder option

2009-07-15 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
New submission from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis : --with-dbmliborder option doesn't allow to specify that no dbm modules are requested. It also doesn't affect "Anthony Baxter's gdbm module". The attached patch allows to specify "--with-dbmliborder=" which should disable building of all