Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment:
I also found several threads saying that the RFC is wrong;
the current uuid.py module returns the correct result.
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
resolution: -> works for me
status: open -> closed
___
Python trac
DSM added the comment:
Hmm. I quickly wrote my own implementation and I agree with the uuid
module and disagree with the RFC value.
Further searching suggests that this may be an error in the RFC. See
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4122 ; see also
http://bugs.sun.com/bugda
New submission from René Puls :
I am trying to recreate the sample output from appendix B of RFC 4122.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt
In that document, a version 3 UUID is created using the DNS namespace
(6ba7b810-9dad-11d1-80b4-00c04fd430c8, same as uuid.NAMESPACE_DNS in
Python) and the
