[issue5372] Distutils inappropriately reuses .o files between extension modules

2012-05-03 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: See also #14517. -- nosy: +eric.araujo resolution: accepted -> fixed stage: patch review -> committed/rejected ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue5372] Distutils inappropriately reuses .o files between extension modules

2010-01-11 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé added the comment: done in r77424, r77425, r77427, r77430 Thanks Collin ! -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue5372] Distutils inappropriately reuses .o files between extension modules

2010-01-10 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé added the comment: This optimization is indeed simplistic. I'll also remove _prep_compiler() in trunk, as I don't see a problem in removing it in the 2.7.x and 3.2.x series. I also need to fix it in 2.6.x / 3.1.x, but I'll keep the private method there. -- priority: ->

[issue5372] Distutils inappropriately reuses .o files between extension modules

2010-01-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: LGTM. Nothing is quite as satisfying as simply deleting a bunch of logic/lines. -- nosy: +skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue5372] Distutils inappropriately reuses .o files between extension modules

2009-02-25 Thread Collin Winter
New submission from Collin Winter : (Tarek, I've been told you're the new distutils maintainer. Feel free to unassign this if that isn't the case.) The test distutils uses to decide whether it needs to recompile an existing .o file when building extension modules is too simplistic, merely compar