[issue4981] Incorrect statement regarding mutable sequences in datamodel Reference

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mitchell Model wrote: > > Mitchell Model added the comment: > >>Benjamin Peterson added the comment: >> >>Fixed in r68707. > > Sorry if I missed that. I checked some of the documentation problems I > reported today again

[issue4981] Incorrect statement regarding mutable sequences in datamodel Reference

Mitchell Model added the comment: >Benjamin Peterson added the comment: > >Fixed in r68707. Sorry if I missed that. I checked some of the documentation problems I reported today against an updated subversion copy of 3.0 and 3.1, but I didn't check all. Got impatient. I'll be more careful.

[issue4981] Incorrect statement regarding mutable sequences in datamodel Reference

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Never mind, I meant r68706. ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://

[issue4981] Incorrect statement regarding mutable sequences in datamodel Reference

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Fixed in r68707. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue4981] Incorrect statement regarding mutable sequences in datamodel Reference

New submission from Mitchell Model : Early in the datamodel document in the Reference documentation is the statement: There is currently a single intrinsic mutable sequence type: This statement is followed by the documentation of Lists and Byte Arrays. The statement should read "There a