[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Change by Andrew Svetlov : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: New changeset 9f04ee569cebb8b4c6f04bea95d91a19c5403806 by Alex Grönholm in branch 'main': bpo-46805: Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio (GH-31455) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9f04ee569cebb8b4c6f04bea95d91a19c5403806 -- __

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Alex Grönholm added the comment: Yeah, my question was specific about the new functions, so I understood that a separate PR should add that to the all the relevant functions. I have a different problem now however: the test suite is failing in CI but not locally. It's giving me NameError abou

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Sorry, I was not clear maybe. Newly added methods can have a `flag` argument from the very beginning. Adding a flag to already existing methods requires a separate issue. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Change by Alex Grönholm : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +29583 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31455 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: A separate issue for 'flags' adding looks better. The reason for missing is an oversight I think. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

Alex Grönholm added the comment: One question: should I add the "flags" argument to the new functions? For some reason it's missing from the existing functions, so maybe I should add that in a separate PR? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue46805] Add low level UDP socket functions to asyncio

New submission from Alex Grönholm : The asyncio module currently has a number of low-level functions for working asynchronously with raw socket objects. Such functions for working with UDP sockets are, however, notably absent, and there is no workaround for this. You can of course use sock_rec