[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Georg Brandl added the comment: OK, fixed up and committed as r68327. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: The patch looks about right. I believe it is a bug that md_state isn't automatically freed; m_free should be used to release any resources stored inside md_state (or any other resources that the module might hold). So please remove the note on releasing md_sta

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Georg Brandl added the comment: Attaching a doc patch -- Martin, could you please confirm that I didn't write nonsense? -- assignee: -> loewis keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12544/new-module-apis.diff ___ Python tracker

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > It would be really nice if there were some notes on use of the tracker. I think Brett has a vision here; you might ping him what the status of that is. ___ Python tracker __

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > > I'm a bit worried about committers giving other committers priorities on > how they should work; as a principle, volunteers are free to work on > whatever the

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: I'm a bit worried about committers giving other committers priorities on how they should work; as a principle, volunteers are free to work on whatever they please, in whatever order they please. So unassigning Georg. -- assignee: georg.brandl -> ___

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: I'm not suggesting that this should block a release (if that is the definition of critical). I do however think this is critical for 3.x's adoption and therefore should be of much importance to us. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson priority: critical -> hi

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: What's the policy for marking bug reports as critical? If the description of the priority (Might block a future release) is normative, why got this report marked critical? I don't think a documentation bug can ever block a release.

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Changes by Benjamin Peterson : ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/pyt

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Changes by Benjamin Peterson : -- priority: -> critical ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- keywords: +needs review nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ __

[issue4614] Document PyModule_Create()

New submission from Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PyModule_Create() is not documented (or at least it isn't showing up in the C API index). Might be other parts of the new module initialization API that are not documented either. -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation me