[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: Fixed with r73114 (trunk), r73117 (py3k), r73119 (2.6) and r73120 (3.0) -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

Changes by Amaury Forgeot d'Arc : -- assignee: -> amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscr

[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

Georg Brandl added the comment: I think you can apply this. -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Yes, target is 2.6.2 and up, 3.0.1 and up. -- versions: +Python 3.0 -Python 2.5, Python 2.5.3 ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

fboule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Is it intended to be applied on Python 2.5.x and/or Python 2.6.x (and when)? The current Python 2.6.1 release does not have the fix. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Attached patch is similar (it declares the variable as "unsigned char*") and adds a test. -- keywords: +needs review, patch nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc stage: -> patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12240/frame_set

[issue4547] Long jumps with frame_setlineno

New submission from fboule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This concerns a known bug in the frame_setlineno() function for Python 2.5.x and 2.6.x (maybe in earlier/later version too). It is not possible to use this function when the address or line offset in lnotab are greater than 127. The problem comes fr