[issue4396] parser module fails to validate "with" statements.

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM, David Binger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Binger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Thanks, Benjamin. > > I see that you applied this to the main python branch, > which is probably okay (tho

[issue4396] parser module fails to validate "with" statements.

David Binger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thanks, Benjamin. I see that you applied this to the main python branch, which is probably okay (though I haven't tested it), but I wrote the patch against the py3k code. Did you mean to apply it to py3k? On Nov 23, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Benjamin

[issue4396] parser module fails to validate "with" statements.

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thanks for the patch! Fixed in r67365. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue4396] parser module fails to validate "with" statements.

New submission from David Binger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The parser module validates node trees when they are built from sequences. The validator must, unfortunately, be updated every time there is a change in the grammar. The current validator fails to validate "with" statements. This bug probabl