Tal Einat added the comment:
Terry, for all intents and purposes you're the one in charge of IDLE now. I
suggest deciding whether to change all three bindings as in the current PR or
only the one for completions. Just le me know and if needed I'll make a new PR.
--
_
Tal Einat added the comment:
> The unknown is whether anyone has changed these pseudoevent bindings and if
> so, how much do we care?
Let's ask on idle-dev.
> Guido, do you have any comment on this proposal from a change policy
> perspective?
I'm not an ex-BDFL, but I can't think of a reas
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
> The unknown is whether anyone has changed these
> pseudoevent bindings and if so, how much do we care?
I don't think we care. Getting tab completion sorted out is the priority.
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Pyth
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Currently, the keys that define certain pseudoevents and invoke the associated
event handlers are fixed: tab, '.', and within strings, '/' and '\' for
completions, '(' and ')' for calltip open and close, and ')', ']', and '}' for
opener matching. Note that
