[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: IDLE also caches shell input. Off topic here, I sent Andre an email about how FT could access it. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Andre Roberge added the comment: Terry: as per your earlier comment, I have tried to use Friendly-traceback with the latest version. While it does set the exception hook correctly, it is not useful. Friendly-traceback (FT) needs to have access to the code that was executed. FT's REPL cache

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset bf782b2636880dd634281f905ae43b8555450ee2 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-43008: Add 'Patch by Ken Hilton' (GH-24370) (#24374) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bf782b2636880dd634281f905ae43b8555450ee2 -- __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset cf883827496d0fbe2c5fe39e4778cd7525f6f7bc by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': bpo-43008: Add 'Patch by Ken Hilton' (GH-24370) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf883827496d0fbe2c5fe39e4778cd7525f6f7bc -- ___

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +23196 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24375 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset 11d75ec807f05eff1148c049e38b808d11c23b8a by Terry Jan Reedy in branch 'master': bpo-43008: Add 'Patch by Ken Hilton' (GH-24370) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/11d75ec807f05eff1148c049e38b808d11c23b8a -- _

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +23195 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24374 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- pull_requests: +23194 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24370 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I hope this is not your last contribution. Another hint: if one uses issue 12643 or #12643, then the tracker makes the link -- and strikes it out if closed. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Ken Hilton added the comment: Oops, gotcha. Thanks for doing the tests. I'm a Python contributor! :D -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Ken, for next time -- there is a separate News category for IDLE. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 6f0346d09f78180886982e070cc92425ada96144 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': bpo-43008: Make IDLE respect sys.excepthook (GH-24302) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6f0346d09f78180886982e070cc92425ada96144 --

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 68102fb9987338a70d69a0162917866e5710458d by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-43008: Make IDLE respect sys.excepthook (GH-24302) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/68102fb9987338a70d69a0162917866e5710458d --

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +23167 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24347 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 pull_requests: +23166 stage: test needed -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24346 ___ Python tracker __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset 7a34380ad76f5ad50d4175ceb2d5715b8cff by Ken in branch 'master': bpo-43008: Make IDLE respect sys.excepthook (GH-24302) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7a34380ad76f5ad50d4175ceb2d5715b8cff -- __

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Ken Hilton added the comment: CLA registers as signed now. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Ken, I read on another issue that an exception in an except suite is automatically linked to the caught exception, though the printed result may not be exactly the same. Once your CLA is 'activated', I will experiment with the options. --

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Andre: with this patch, you could potentially add a function or submodule that would point sys.excepthook to a function that would print the exception and then interact before returning. If this worked, one could add, for instance, 'import friendly_tracebac

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Andre Roberge added the comment: Terry: I will put it on my todo list. Friendly-traceback can currently work (indirectly) with IDLE; see https://aroberge.github.io/friendly-traceback-docs/docs/html/editor.html I am not sure what benefit this patch will yield when it comes to using Friendly

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Ken: I will probably work on tests, perhaps as a followup or parallel issue. I will likely do a bit or refactoring to make testing easier. I just looked at print_exception and discovered that the double traceback can likely by handled by properly setting ex

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Andre: while I would like friendlier tracebacks available in IDLE without 3rd party installation, I doubt this will happen soon. In the meanwhile, I see that you are working to polish Friendly Traceback with a friendly contest. I presume FT uses sys.except

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Ken Hilton added the comment: Made requested changes, besides the tests. I didn't manage to figure out how to go about testing an excepthook in the first place, let alone a good or bad one. Hope that's not an issue. -- Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file49758/bpo-43008.patch.2

[issue43008] IDLE ignores sys.excepthook in normal, subprocess mode

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I looked at all 4 hooks. sys.breakpointhook is invoked by breakpoint() in user code, so is not IDLE's concern at present. sys.unraiseablehook is invoked by the interpreter when user code messes up badly, so is not IDLE's condern. (And it is an expert featu