[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-07 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Actually, that the build doesn't work is almost OK, because that seealso directive was invalid markup syntax (until very recently) :) Anyway, should be fixed now after a "make update". -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed _

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-06 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
Barry A. Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: r67136 is a workaround found by Christian. We'll go with this for the 3.9rc2 release and make this a deferred blocker for a proper fix for the next rc. -- priority: release blocker -> deferred blocker resolution: fixed ->

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-06 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
Barry A. Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Sorry, but this is still not fixed: tnow using/cmdline Exception occurred: File "/private/tmp/py3k/dist/Python-3.0rc2/Doc/tools/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py", line 2055, in run_directive % (type_name, i, result[i])) AssertionError: D

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-06 Thread Georg Brandl
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-06 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > In other words, the various *Tex packages cannot agree on a common syntax? No, syntax has nothing to do with it. It was a mistake of some sort on my part. It depends on whether the "ifxetex" latex package is present, because that already defi

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-06 Thread Winfried Plappert
Winfried Plappert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: And Ubuntu Linux pdflatex complains as well: /usr/bin/pdflatex from package texlive-latex-base. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-06 Thread Winfried Plappert
Winfried Plappert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: In other words, the various *Tex packages cannot agree on a common syntax? MiKTeX-pdfTeX 2.7.3147 (1.40.9) (MiKTeX 2.7) also complains about the double \fi. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-05 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The issue is not as "easy" as it seems (or at least that's what I believe). Barry, if you install the xetex package, the build should run fine. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-05 Thread Winfried Plappert
Winfried Plappert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This is a simple one to fix: remove the second \fi on the incriminated line in sphinx.sty, line 62. I just checked out Sphinx version 67115 and retested. With my fix = removal of the second \fi, the make process works. The issue also app

[issue4266] Python 3.0 docs are broken.

2008-11-05 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The Python 3.0 documentation is broken. This is blocking the 3.0rc2 release. I'm too tired right now to figure out what the base problem is. This was during the ".../release.py --export 3.0rc2" build phase. pdflatex 'c-api.tex' This is p