[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- nosy: -terry.reedy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Dima Tisnek added the comment: Would now, a year later, be a good time to consider io_uring? -- nosy: +Dima.Tisnek ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I'm closing this as "later" as the consensus is that this might be a useful binding to have, but io_uring is evolving too fast at the moment. It is better to develop these bindings on PyPI, which also makes it easier to iterate on the design. -- r

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I think that the answer is maybe, eventually, and if so, an ioring module that any event framework can use and a separate asyncio module for its use with asyncio. I say maybe because the lwn article suggests that additions and revisions might continue for a

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Change by Giampaolo Rodola' : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- nosy: +corona10 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pytho

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Ammar Askar added the comment: See also: https://github.com/python-trio/trio/issues/932 which contains a link to a library with cffi bindings to io_uring -- nosy: +ammar2 ___ Python tracker

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Cooper Lees added the comment: Totally agree with a separate module first to POC. I should have stated that. Main goal was to open this issue to start discussions :) -- ___ Python tracker __

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: I agree that adding stdlib support is premature. io_uring has a large and growing API surface. It will take some experimentation to see what the best way to expose its power to Python is. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson __

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: How stable is the io_uring API? The stdlib evolves slowly, I'm not sure if the io_uring interface has matured enough to make it acceptable that updates to the stdlib bindings for that API are only done in new major releases of CPython (about every 18 months

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

New submission from Cooper Lees : Would adding support for io_uring in Linux to stadlib IO and/or asyncio make sense? More info on io_uring: - https://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdf - https://lwn.net/Articles/810414/ -- components: IO messages: 373477 nosy: cooperlees priority: normal severit