[issue4115] split() method

Terry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Benjamin, Thanks. The documentation cleared this up for me. Thanks. Terry On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > -- > resolution: -> invalid > status: open -> closed

[issue4115] split() method

Terry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Tim, Duh, thanks sorry I didn't check the documentation. Thanks. Terry On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Tim Gordon wrote: > > Tim Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > This is the intended behaviour. See > http://www.python.org/doc/2.5.2/lib

[issue4115] split() method

Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- resolution: -> invalid status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ _

[issue4115] split() method

Tim Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This is the intended behaviour. See http://www.python.org/doc/2.5.2/lib/string-methods.html for details. -- nosy: +QuantumTim ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue4115] split() method

New submission from Terry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: x = "Four score and seven" x.split() => ["Four", "score", "and", "seven"] x.split(" ") => ["Four", "score", " ", "and", "seven"] Probably not a big deal but it seems that it should be consistent. One of my students spotted it. -- c