[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

STINNER Victor added the comment: PR #17010 of bpo-22367 added tests for fcntl.lockf(). I close this PR as a duplicate of bpo-22367. Thanks @nanjekyejoannah anyway! -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Add open_file_descri

[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: @victor looks to be the author of the change the introduced the tests that can resolve this. Victor, can we consider this closed. I have no problem closing the issue and the related PR. -- nosy: +vstinner ___ P

[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: @nanjekyejoannah IMHO, tests were added through bpo-22367 I think that we can close this issue. What do you think? -- nosy: +corona10 ___ Python tracker __

[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: I have opened a PR with this test. If you think its great, we can use the same test to test posix.lockf(). The one I have written in more detailed than the current test for posix.lockf(). Correcting the above comment. --

[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: I have opened a PR with this test. If you think its great, we can use the same test to test posix.lock(). The one I have written in more detailed than the current test for posix.lock(). -- ___ Python tracker

[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

New submission from Joannah Nanjekye : We need to implement a test for fcntl.lockf(). -- components: Tests messages: 341031 nosy: christian.heimes, nanjekyejoannah priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Create test for fcntl.lockf() versions: Python 3.8 _

[issue36746] Create test for fcntl.lockf()

Change by Joannah Nanjekye : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +12920 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bug