[issue33381] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f

Change by Fred L. Drake, Jr. : -- nosy: +fdrake ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.

[issue33381] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f

Paul Ganssle added the comment: I don't believe this is a duplicate if #32267, which is actually about the %z directive. I think the implementation here is correct and the documentation is semi-correct, it depends on how you look at it, consider: >>> datetime(2018, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1).strftim

[issue33381] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f

Change by Paul Ganssle : -- nosy: +p-ganssle ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pyt

[issue33381] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f

Josh Rosenberg added the comment: Note: strftime follows the existing documentation: >>> datetime.datetime(1970, 1, 1, microsecond=1).strftime('%f') '01' The strptime behavior bug seems like a duplicate of #32267, which claims to be fixed in master as of early January; may not have made i

[issue33381] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f

New submission from Judy Wang : According to https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html, %f is zero-padded on the left. But actual Python 3 behavior is puts the zero padding on the right. -- files: Bug description.py messages: 315873 nosy: jujuwoman priority: normal severity: norma