[issue32985] subprocess.Popen: Confusing documentation for restore_signals

R. David Murray added the comment: Well, I imagine the original author thought of "python" as python itself, not the user's python program. That's certainly how I understood it when I read it in your message. It would not be a bad thing to clarify that, though. -- nosy: +r.david.mur

[issue32985] subprocess.Popen: Confusing documentation for restore_signals

Change by Ned Deily : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue32985] subprocess.Popen: Confusing documentation for restore_signals

New submission from Alicia Boya García : The docs state: > If restore_signals is true (the default) all signals that Python has set to > SIG_IGN are restored to SIG_DFL in the child process before the exec. > Currently this includes the SIGPIPE, SIGXFZ and SIGXFSZ signals. (POSIX only) The fi