[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Change by Joshua Bronson : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +8368 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-l

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Change by Giampaolo Rodola' : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Change by Joshua Bronson : -- nosy: +jab ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Yury Selivanov added the comment: > Do these really need to be builtins? We're only beginning to see async iterators being used in the wild, so we can't have a definitive answer at this point. > They seem too specialized to be widely useful; I've personally never needed > them in any async

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: Do these really need to be builtins? They seem too specialized to be widely useful; I've personally never needed them in any async code I've written. It would make more sense to me to put them in a module like operators. -- nosy: +Jelle Zijlstra __

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Change by Julian Mehnle : -- nosy: +jmehnle ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pyth

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Davide Rizzo added the comment: I attempted to make a Python implementation (attached) to use in my code. There are a few questions in the comments. One of the complications is the async equivalent of next with two arguments like next(iterator, default). It cannot return the result of __anext

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Yury Selivanov added the comment: > No, just this tracker issue, a PR and a reviewer. (Sorry, I can't review CPython code myself any more.) Alright, I'll work on a PR after PEP 55x. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Guido van Rossum added the comment: > do we need a PEP to add aiter() and anext() builtins? No, just this tracker issue, a PR and a reviewer. (Sorry, I can't review CPython code myself any more.) -- ___ Python tracker

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Yury Selivanov added the comment: Guido, do we need a PEP to add aiter() and anext() builtins? -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

Change by Davide Rizzo : -- nosy: +gvanrossum, yselivanov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http

[issue31861] aiter() and anext() built-in functions

New submission from Davide Rizzo : PEP 525 suggested that adding aiter() and anext() would need to wait until async __aiter__ is dropped in 3.7. Issue 31709 solved that, so now it would be possible to add them. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 304910 nosy: davide.rizzo priority: