[issue3165] cPickle recursion problem

Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'm reverting this patch, see issue #3179. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___

[issue3165] cPickle recursion problem

Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Applied this patch. Daniel, don't know about that "rule"... I didn't get any warning with gcc... Anyway, this fixes the issue of #2702. Thanks cuerty! -- resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed ___

[issue3165] cPickle recursion problem

Daniel Darabos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Added lines have to come after the "static char..." declarations to comply with C. Unfortunately I am not experienced with building Python on Windows, so I could not really try the patch, sorry. (I can get a cPickle.pyd, but it does not repla

[issue3165] cPickle recursion problem

Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: What is this fixing? Could you please provide a test cases that fails without this patch? Thank you!! -- nosy: +facundobatista ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue3165] cPickle recursion problem

New submission from Angel Freire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: A single Picklerobject->nesting++ will not take into consideration the stack overhead caused by calls from save->save_{list,dict}->batch{list,dict}. -- components: Library (Lib) files: cpickle-r64448.diff keywords: patch messages: 685