[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: Thanks! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: New changeset 641494ec3168bd556f0af226196e13ae29bddd53 by Mariatta (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6': bpo-31621: Fix typo in Simple Statements documentation (GH-3809) (GH-3810) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/641494ec3168bd556f0af226196e13ae29bd

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Roundup Robot
Change by Roundup Robot : -- pull_requests: +3795 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Kevin
Kevin added the comment: Ok, I've created a pull request, available at https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3809. -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Kevin
Change by Kevin : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +3793 stage: needs patch -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Kevin
Kevin added the comment: Yes, I intend to make a PR shortly. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: Thanks Kevin. Can you open a pull request with this change? -- nosy: +Mariatta stage: -> needs patch ___ Python tracker ___

[issue31621] Pluralization typo in Language Reference section 7.12

2017-09-28 Thread Kevin
New submission from Kevin : The documentation for the `global` statement contains the line: > CPython implementation detail: The current implementation does not enforce > some of these restriction [...] "restriction" should be "restrictions" since there is more than one of them. Attached is