[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Changes by Brett Cannon : -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bu

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Brett Cannon added the comment: So the reason we don't have the coverage run complain loudly is it takes at least 40 minutes to complete, so having to wait for that could potentially be annoying if you're e.g. trying to merge a cherry-pick and you just want to verify you didn't break anything.

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: The list of failing tests in issue29048 contains test_traceback and test_xml_etree. Thus this issue may be a part of issue29048. Some tests may be fixed since reporting issue29048. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: I'll look into creating a PR when I have some time. It would also be useful to tweak the Travis/coverage configuration so that it fails loudly if one of the tests doesn't pass in the coverage check. -- ___ Python tr

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Brett Cannon added the comment: BTW, just because I assigned this to me doesn't mean others can't write a PR to solve this. :) I will review any PR that fixes this issue, I'm just going to make sure it gets solved no matter what if no one else creates a PR. --

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Brett Cannon added the comment: I don't think it's a duplicate because we had a passing coverage run when we initially made the migration so something got tweaked to lead to the failures. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Is this a duplicate of issue29048? -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bu

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Changes by Brett Cannon : -- assignee: -> brett.cannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https:/

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

Brett Cannon added the comment: The test_traceback changes should be easy to tweak to use a regex or startwith() check so the tests pass again. For the test_xml_etree failures I'm not sure how best to fix that other than taking it out. Maybe if sys.gettrace() returns something then skip the te

[issue29691] Some tests fail in coverage Travis check

New submission from Jelle Zijlstra: A few tests fail in the coverage Travis target (see e.g. https://travis-ci.org/python/cpython/jobs/206480468): test_traceback and test_xml_etree. I extracted the actual failures by running in verbose mode locally: ===