Martin Panter added the comment:
Here is a new version which I think should be okay to apply. I restored the
references to the base class, but now using the MessageDefect name. I removed
the changes relating to raise_on_defect not being strict, in favour of fixing
Issue 24364.
--
depe
New submission from Martin Panter:
In trying to understand the defects from parsing an email Message object, and
trying to use the raise_on_defect=True mode, I found a few inconsistencies with
the documentation. I made a preliminary patch, but it may need adjusting.
1. There is no class called
