[issue26775] Improve test coverage on urllib.parse

2016-04-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Senthil Kumaran added the comment: Thanks for your contribution, Luiz. It's a useful improvement. Committed to all active branches. 2.7 changeset: 101012:e3ed950ad728 -- nosy: +orsenthil resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5

[issue26775] Improve test coverage on urllib.parse

2016-04-16 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 8f02747ff908 by Senthil Kumaran in branch '3.5': issue26775 - Improve test coverage for urllib.parse https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f02747ff908 New changeset 401dca6ac084 by Senthil Kumaran in branch 'default': merge 3.5 https://hg.python.org/cp

[issue26775] Improve test coverage on urllib.parse

2016-04-15 Thread Luiz Poleto
New submission from Luiz Poleto: urllib.parse has two methods, parse_qs and parse_qsl to parse a query string and return its parameters/values as a dictionary or a list, respectively. However, the unit tests only tests parse_qsl, which is also incomplete since both parse_qs and parse_qsl suppo