[issue25048] %e Directive Missing in Datetime Documentation

R. David Murray added the comment: strftime passes the string through to the OS, which sometimes supports more format codes than the ones documented as working on all platforms. There is a note in the docs about this. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: -> not a bug status: open ->

[issue25048] %e Directive Missing in Datetime Documentation

Changes by R. David Murray : -- stage: -> resolved ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue25048] %e Directive Missing in Datetime Documentation

Marc Bouvier added the comment: Sorry, the documentation page I am looking at is https://docs.python.org/2/library/datetime.html#strftime-and-strptime-behavior and https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#strftime-and-strptime-behavior. -- _

[issue25048] %e Directive Missing in Datetime Documentation

New submission from Marc Bouvier: The %e directive is missing in the Datetime documentation. I have tried this directive in 2.6.6, 2.7.2, and 2.7.10 using datetime.datetime.strftime(datetime.datetime.now(), '%A, %B %e, %Y') and it works in all cases. The below documentation line is pulled fro