[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Alexandre Vassalotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Bob Kline wrote: > I just ran into this behavior with an attempt to pickle a dom tree > for an XML document whose nesting level never got deeper than nine > child nodes, and indeed it crashed the interpreter. Pickling recursive data-str

[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Bob Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I just ran into this behavior with an attempt to pickle a dom tree for an XML document whose nesting level never got deeper than nine child nodes, and indeed it crashed the interpreter. Throwing an exception would be preferable, of course, to sile

[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Changes by Jesús Cea Avión <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +jcea __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Daniel Darabos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Sidenote: If I click "edit" for nonrecursivepickler.py, I get told that "File has been classified as spam." Strange. Should I not use Viagra as a classname? :) (j/k I didn't do anything like that) However I have now fixed a mistake in my code

[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Changes by Ralf Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +schmir __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Changes by Daniel Darabos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9851/picklertest.py __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-b

[issue2480] pickling of large recursive structures fails

Daniel Darabos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: So now I've learned that this is a result of the way Pickler is implemented. I think that it would make sense to create an implementation that is not that recursive and that would handle such structures better. I have now written one such imp