[issue2452] inaccuracy in httplib timeout documentation

2008-05-11 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thanks, fixed in r63058. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ _

[issue2452] inaccuracy in httplib timeout documentation

2008-03-30 Thread Alan Kennedy
Changes by Alan Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +amak __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: h

[issue2452] inaccuracy in httplib timeout documentation

2008-03-21 Thread John J Lee
John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Oops, un-finished sentence in my opening comment ("In fact, other non-blocking.") should have read: In fact, other blocking operations will also time out. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue2452] inaccuracy in httplib timeout documentation

2008-03-21 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +facundobatista __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue2452] inaccuracy in httplib timeout documentation

2008-03-21 Thread John J Lee
New submission from John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The documentation for the new timeout support in 2.6 states that "If the optional timeout parameter is given, connection attempts will timeout after that many seconds". In fact, other non-blocking. The only operation that might block for longe