[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Thanks for the review. I committed my patch in the hope that it makes it into 3.5.2, but if people want to suggest further improvements etc that is okay. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a7e04b4e51b2 by Martin Panter in branch '3.5': Issue #24136: Document generalized unpacking, PEP 448 https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a7e04b4e51b2 New changeset 4cf3389cd8e6 by Martin Panter in branch 'default': Issue #24136: Merge unpacking doc fr

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: Thanks for writing a better patch. The patch looks good to me and it builds correctly. -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Here is a new patch that also updates the documentation for list etc displays as well as function calls. Let me know what you think. The 3.5 What’s New notes were written separately; Neil’s patch was never applied. But I have rescued his update for functools.pa

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: -pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pyth

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Thanks for helping with this Jelle. The documentation of unpacking sequences vs iterables was adjusted in 3.6 as part of Issue 23275. I guess part of revision 8a0754fed986 should be extracted to 3.5 as well. Looking at the function call syntax, positional and

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: This updates reference_calls_syntax_update.diff. The previous patch's grammard had a mistake; it was missing commas between arguments. I believe all other patches in this diff are now obsolete. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file43302/issue24136

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: Here's what I found reviewing what needs to be done here: - Neil's What's New patch apparently made it into the 3.5 release notes. - moigagoo's two patches haven't been committed. The text of both looks ok to me, but the patches don't apply cleanly. Other area

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Zachary Ware : -- hgrepos: -336 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Brett Cannon : -- nosy: -brett.cannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg263250 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing li

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Berker Peksag added the comment: supriyanto maftuh,st, please don't play with tracker items. -- components: -Benchmarks, Build, IO, Unicode, Windows, XML, email versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

supriyanto maftuh,st added the comment: Hy -- components: +Benchmarks, Build, IO, Unicode, Windows, XML, email hgrepos: +336 nosy: +barry, brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, haypo, paul.moore, pitrou, r.david.murray, steve.dower, supriyanto maftuh, supriyanto maftuh,st, tim.golden, zach.ware

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: It is now 10 months and 2 releases since the rather large code patch. Documenting the extensive changes does not seem easy to me ;-). Certainly, a beginner needs feedback. -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- nosy: +berker.peksag stage: needs patch -> patch review versions: +Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Konstantin Molchanov : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39919/replace_sequence_with_iterable.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Konstantin Molchanov added the comment: I've updated the Calls syntax reference in reference/expressions and the assignment object description in reference/simple_stmts. Please tell me if I'm generally doing OK. If I'm not, please guide me to the right direction. -- Added file: http:/

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Copied from closed issue 24240: Since Grammar/Grammar relies on semantic postprocessing in ast.c, it would be nice to have an update of the (human readable) Grammar in the language reference docs. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: FWIW, I still emails from the tracker, even the ones with my own comments and changes. All I can suggest is check the address you have set, check for spam, etc. I don’t @mentioning will do anything here. But as long as the person is in the nosy list they _shou

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Neil Girdhar added the comment: I don't receive emails from the tracker anymore either and I have no idea why that is. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Konstantin Molchanov added the comment: @vadmium thanks for the assistance! I'll kick off with the reference then. P.S. Am I the only one who doesn't receive any emails from the tracker? I never got the registration link or a follow-up notification from this issue. Am I missing something? P.P

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Yes I think it is expected and documented that the leftovers are turned into a list. See . I originally had similar confusion, expectating the starred target to become a tuple, because people ofte

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Konstantin Molchanov added the comment: Hi! I'd like to update the docs with the examples of the new syntax usage. This is my first contribution to the Python docs, so I'd like to ask for some assistance. I'm going to start with adding an example to the tutorial (https://docs.python.org/3.5/

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Changes by Neil Girdhar : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39562/wn2.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Simplified functools.partial documentation. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39561/wn2.diff ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Just updated the "what's new". Also, thank you for adding my name to Misc/Acks. Should we also add Joshua Landau's name? He helped me quite a bit with the implementation, and he wrote the PEP. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +neil.g Added file: http://bugs.

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Changes by Martin Panter : -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pytho

[issue24136] document PEP 448

New submission from Benjamin Peterson: PEP 448 has been implemented (#2292), but the documentation hasn't been updated. Updating the documentation will improve looking through Doc/reference/* and making sure the documentation (and grammar) for calls and assignments is updated for PEP 448's ne