[issue23081] Document PySequence_List(o) as equivalent to list(o)

2015-03-12 Thread Berker Peksag
Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks for the report and the patch, Lars. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker _

[issue23081] Document PySequence_List(o) as equivalent to list(o)

2015-03-12 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset e31e987207ab by Berker Peksag in branch '3.4': Issue #23081: Document that PySequence_List also accepts iterables. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e31e987207ab New changeset eb4a0048978c by Berker Peksag in branch 'default': Issue #23081: Document

[issue23081] Document PySequence_List(o) as equivalent to list(o)

2015-03-08 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: +1 -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https

[issue23081] Document PySequence_List(o) as equivalent to list(o)

2015-03-08 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: LGTM, can we have a formal review please. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue23081] Document PySequence_List(o) as equivalent to list(o)

2014-12-18 Thread Berker Peksag
Changes by Berker Peksag : -- nosy: +berker.peksag, tim.peters ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue23081] Document PySequence_List(o) as equivalent to list(o)

2014-12-18 Thread Lars Buitinck
New submission from Lars Buitinck: PySequence_List has accepted iterables since changeset 6c82277e77f3 of May 1, 2001 ("NEEDS DOC CHANGES" :), but its documentation still only speaks of sequences. I suggest that it is changed to promise to handle arbitrary iterables, just like PySequence_Tuple