[issue2266] Missing documentation about old/new-style classes

Georg Brandl added the comment: The new docs already have glossary entries that point to the datamodel doc. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue2266] Missing documentation about old/new-style classes

Yinon Ehrlich added the comment: * http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html covers new style and old style quite well. However, for the sake of the reader who reads it top-down, it will be nice to add internal cross references (to http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#new-style

[issue2266] Missing documentation about old/new-style classes

R. David Murray added the comment: I think this can be closed as 'out of date'. The language reference chapter has a section on old and new style classes, and in the tutorial section the reference to 'new style class' is hyperlinked to a glossary entry that in turn contains a pointer to that la

[issue2266] Missing documentation about old/new-style classes

Changes by Yinon Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/m

[issue2266] Missing documentation about old/new-style classes

New submission from Yinon Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: http://docs.python.org/tut/node11.html talks about old/new style classes. But there is no any explanation what it is. The same for http://docs.python.org/ref/node33.html My suggestion: refer to http://wiki.python.org/moin/NewClassVsClassicCla