[issue21485] remove unnecesary .flush() calls in the asyncio subprocess code example

STINNER Victor added the comment: I wrote the example and the first call to buffer.flush() is a mistake. Thanks for your patch, I applied it. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue21485] remove unnecesary .flush() calls in the asyncio subprocess code example

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset c0404f0da01a by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4': Issue #21485: remove unnecesary .flush() calls in the asyncio subprocess code http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c0404f0da01a New changeset 3c26389d741c by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': (Merge 3.4)

[issue21485] remove unnecesary .flush() calls in the asyncio subprocess code example

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-li

[issue21485] remove unnecesary .flush() calls in the asyncio subprocess code example

New submission from akira: The current code example contains [1]: print("Python failed with exit code %s:" % exitcode) sys.stdout.flush() sys.stdout.buffer.flush() sys.stdout.buffer.write(stdout) sys.stdout.buffer.flush() that looks bizarre. Either a comment should be added