[issue2015] Possible optimisations in kwargs handling

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Curtin
Brian Curtin added the comment: This was handled in r65241 as a result of #1819. -- nosy: +brian.curtin resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed superseder: -> Speed hack for function calls with named parameters ___

[issue2015] Possible optimisations in kwargs handling

2008-02-10 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Amaury, you may take a look at the patch in issue #1819. Also, dict lookups have a big overhead compared to raw pointer compares, I'm not sure naively converting all kwargs handling to dict lookups would make things faster. -- nosy: +pitrou

[issue2015] Possible optimisations in kwargs handling

2008-02-06 Thread Christian Heimes
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- components: +Interpreter Core priority: -> normal __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue2015] Possible optimisations in kwargs handling

2008-02-05 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
New submission from Amaury Forgeot d'Arc: This is a reminder for the comment on top of ceval.c: /* XXX TO DO: XXX speed up searching for keywords by using a dictionary XXX document it! */ It was also suggested to disallow subclasses of str in variable names, in order to optimize compari