[issue2003] Incorrect definition of new-style class

Georg Brandl added the comment: Thanks for the delightful analysis! Fixed in r60550 :) -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue2003] Incorrect definition of new-style class

New submission from Thane Plummer: Python Reference Manual section 3.3 (p3 s2) contains the fragment "A new-style class neither more nor less than a user-defined type." A well placed 2-letter verb would transform this sad little fragment into a delightful, pleasing, and ultimately useful sent