Georg Brandl added the comment:
That would be correct as a handwaving description, but it's wrong as a formal
spec. The "or_expr" already includes the possibility of a tuple; there is no
"exec(" token etc.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> works for me
status: open -> closed
___
New submission from engelbert gruber:
the doc says::
exec_stmt ::= "exec" or_expr ["in" expression ["," expression]]
imho it should read ::
exec_stmt ::= "exec" expression ["in" expression ["," expression]]
| "exec(" expression [ ", expression" [ ", expression" ]] ")"
