[issue19311] devguide: hg bisect section could be clearer

2013-10-20 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti added the comment: I agree with Antoine, but mentioning hg update is a good idea so I changed that. -- assignee: -> ezio.melotti resolution: wont fix -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: -> enhancement ___

[issue19311] devguide: hg bisect section could be clearer

2013-10-20 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 24c2cfee3b06 by Ezio Melotti in branch 'default': #19311: mention hg update in the bisect faq. http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/24c2cfee3b06 -- nosy: +python-dev status: pending -> open ___ Python tracke

[issue19311] devguide: hg bisect section could be clearer

2013-10-20 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I don't think we want the devguide to become a Mercurial manual. Also, it is easy to get help for a Mercurial command: just type "hg help bisect". -- nosy: +pitrou resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> pending ___

[issue19311] devguide: hg bisect section could be clearer

2013-10-20 Thread Martin Matusiak
New submission from Martin Matusiak: The offending section: http://docs.python.org/devguide/faq.html#how-do-i-find-which-changeset-introduced-a-bug-or-regression I think this could be improved a bit. The key point is that "hg bisect --bad/good" is a command relative to the checked out changeset