[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

Change by Cheryl Sabella : -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Format mini-language integer definition is incorrect ___ Python tracker _

[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

Georg Brandl added the comment: The bug is that "integer" links to the "integer" production in the Python grammar. This shouldn't happen; I'll have a look on the Sphinx side. As a workaround, "integer" can be replaced by "digit+" as requested (it occurs twice). -- nosy: +georg.brandl

[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

Changes by Georg Brandl : -- assignee: docs@python -> eric.smith nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

New submission from David Chambers: I first raised this issue on Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19203194 The [replacement field grammar][1] states that an [integer][2] is a valid field_name, but this is inaccurate: >>> '{0}'.format('zero') 'zero' >>> '{0x0}.for