[issue18970] run_setup() behavior differs from cli invocation of setup.py

Steve Dower added the comment: Distutils is now deprecated (see PEP 632) and all tagged issues are being closed. From now until removal, only release blocking issues will be considered for distutils. If this issue does not relate to distutils, please remove the component and reopen it. If y

[issue18970] run_setup() behavior differs from cli invocation of setup.py

Éric Araujo added the comment: > The principle of least surprise suggests that run_setup() should behave > equivalently > to a command line invocation of setup.py. That’s debatable: distutils.core.setup corresponds to a command-line invocation of setup.py, but run_setup is documented as someth

[issue18970] run_setup() behavior differs from cli invocation of setup.py

Changes by Lukas Wunner : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31663/run_setup-py27.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue18970] run_setup() behavior differs from cli invocation of setup.py

Changes by Lukas Wunner : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31664/run_setup-py26.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue18970] run_setup() behavior differs from cli invocation of setup.py

New submission from Lukas Wunner: The principle of least surprise suggests that run_setup() should behave equivalently to a command line invocation of setup.py. However there are currently (at least) two issues preventing this: (a) When calling exec(), both a globals and a locals dict is pass

[issue18970] run_setup() behavior differs from cli invocation of setup.py

Changes by Lukas Wunner : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31662/run_setup-py31.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing