[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

Change by STINNER Victor : -- resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

STINNER Victor added the comment: I'm sorry, but since nobody is able to review or test your patch, I have to close this issue which didn't get any activity for 5 years :-( -- nosy: +vstinner ___ Python tracker

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

David Edelsohn added the comment: I meant I don't see the equivalent of your patch in the upstream repository, so no one from the Fedora community appears to have contributed something equivalent yet. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda added the comment: Hmm, good point. I'll try to discuss with Fedora people who work on secondary arches. Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

David Edelsohn added the comment: If you look at the top of config.sub it says: # Please send patches with a ChangeLog entry to config-patc...@gnu.org. # You can get the latest version of this script from: # http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;a=blob_plain;f=config.sub;hb=HEAD I

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda added the comment: So, to give it a little background: I need this for Fedora builds on ppc64p7. Just the name recognition helps, because the name is passed automatically by rpmbuild to configure (== if not recognized, build fails). So this is basically a way for confi

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

David Edelsohn added the comment: If I understand correctly, config.sub is imported from upstream FSF project. I do not know how much CPython diverges from the upstream file and merges in local changes. I'm still a little confused about what this patch accomplishes. One can configure with C

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

David Edelsohn added the comment: A POWER7 optimized build is fine, but how does recognizing an additional name help? I assume this is just a first step before generating different compiler options based on the name. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: +David.Edelsohn ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mai

[issue17837] Support for building on ppc64p7

New submission from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda: Hi, would it be possible to add ppc64p7 (Power7 optimized) to supported arches in config.sub? It should be as easy as the attached one-liner patch. Thanks. -- components: Build files: python-add-support-for-ppc64p7.patch keywords: patch mess