[issue1764986] generic and more efficient removal of unreachable code

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Not too excited about this. It adds to compilation time but doesn't save any runtime. It's not at all common for production code to have unreachable code at RAISE_VARARGS or BREAK_LOOP, so I see no reason to complexify to the peepholer

[issue1764986] generic and more efficient removal of unreachable code

Changes by Georg Brandl: -- assignee: -> rhettinger _ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: