[issue17587] Have all core library modules imported by default

2013-04-01 Thread Daniel Ellis
Daniel Ellis added the comment: It was a hell of a ride. On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > Benjamin Peterson added the comment: > > Well, the fun has been had. > > -- > nosy: +benjamin.peterson > resolution: -> rejected > status: open -> closed > > _

[issue17587] Have all core library modules imported by default

2013-04-01 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Well, the fun has been had. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue17587] Have all core library modules imported by default

2013-03-31 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: Ah, I see I misunderstood the argument, here. Upon reflection, this clearly deserves an opportunity for input from other developers. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: invalid -> stage: committed/rejected -> status: closed -> open ___

[issue17587] Have all core library modules imported by default

2013-03-31 Thread R. David Murray
Changes by R. David Murray : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg185630 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue17587] Have all core library modules imported by default

2013-03-31 Thread R. David Murray
Changes by R. David Murray : -- resolution: -> invalid stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue17587] Have all core library modules imported by default

2013-03-31 Thread Daniel Ellis
New submission from Daniel Ellis: The other day I was trying to make a script to import a CSV file but for the life of me couldn't remember what the name of the csv library was (turns out it was csv). So I started thinking "hey, what if all the standard library were just *there* by default"?