[issue17033] RPM spec file has old config_binsuffix value

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: We just removed the spec file. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> out of date status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue17033] RPM spec file has old config_binsuffix value

Taavi Burns added the comment: I'm not sure my vote means much, but the spec file didn't work for me on CentOS 5 anyway (weird issue with the -dev RPM trying to find "python2.72.7"). I think I'd prefer a README with suggested places to look for a working spec file than have this "blessed"-but-

[issue17033] RPM spec file has old config_binsuffix value

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Do we even *use* the spec file in Misc/RPM for anything any more? Should we just delete the entire directory? (Added Sean and Dave Malcolm to the nosy list) -- nosy: +dmalcolm, jafo ___ Python tracker

[issue17033] RPM spec file has old config_binsuffix value

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +ncoghlan stage: -> patch review versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pytho

[issue17033] RPM spec file has old config_binsuffix value

Taavi Burns added the comment: The diff against 3.3. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28824/python-3.3.spec.diff ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue17033] RPM spec file has old config_binsuffix value

New submission from Taavi Burns: Looking at the Misc/RPM/python-X.X.spec files, they seem to be slightly out of date. Near the top of the file is a config_binsuffix configuration setting that is "2.6" for both the 2.7 and 3.3 branches! I suspect that it should be updated with the version and l