[issue16436] Missing anchor in doc

Changes by Chris Jerdonek : -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue16436] Missing anchor in doc

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Currently, the built-in types are not treated consistently as to whether their constructors are documented in the "Built-in Functions" or "Built-in Types" page. There are some open issues related to this topic (see, for example, issue 16209). For the purpose

[issue16436] Missing anchor in doc

Changes by Jesús Cea Avión : -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.

[issue16436] Missing anchor in doc

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: I guess the reason is that names are classes, not functions. See http://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#func-dict also for example. -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker

[issue16436] Missing anchor in doc

New submission from Yongzhi Pan: http://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#func-frozenset http://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#func-set frozenset and set function have no links to their definitions. Also the anchor name is prefixed with func, which is different to other builti