[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-17 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: And I want to add that I am glad that is finally fixed, so I really appreciate the work people done in this direction in their free time. -- ___ Python tracker _

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-17 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: This bug may be fixed. Unfortunately I do not possess original setup anymore. The primary issue is still issue648658 and that affects bzr + launchpad integration, XML-RPC access to bugzilla and probably more. -- ___

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-16 Thread STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor added the comment: @techtonik: You wrote "HTTPConnection" twice. I don't really understand your request. Do you think that the issue is fixed in Python trunk or not? If not, please open a new issue since this issue is closed. techtonik> And I still would like to see this fix in P

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-16 Thread STINNER Victor
Changes by STINNER Victor : -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-16 Thread STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor added the comment: @techtonik: We wrote "HTTPConnection" twice. I don't really understand your request. Do you think that the issue is fixed in Python trunk or not? If not, please open a new issue since this issue is closed. techtonik> And I still would like to see this fix in Py

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-16 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: There should be a better way to do this check, because HTTPConnection method may exists, but HTTPConnection may be impossible, because of other reasons. And I still would like to see this fix in Python 2.6 - too bad it hadn't enough attention before 2.6.

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-16 Thread STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor added the comment: @techtonik: I don't think that testing socket._have_ssl is better than testing for HTTPSConnection. socket._have_ssl might be True, whereas HTTPSConnection is missing for a random reason. xmlrpclib uses HTTPSConnection, not directly the socket library. HTTPSConn

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-16 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: Yep, the patch at #6267 is an extension of this one except for the last chunk where I also check if sockets are ssl-enabled. I am not sure why it was needed. It also may have been already fixed somewhere else. As this bug doesn't have any tests attached it

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-14 Thread STINNER Victor
Changes by STINNER Victor : -- resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2009-09-14 Thread STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor added the comment: I consider this issue as a duplicate of #6267 which is already fixed (commited). Reopen the issue if I'm wrong ;-) See also #2076 and #1767370 (other duplicates). -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2008-07-01 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: * use newer 2.0 public interface of httplib for connection handling Attached patch is for trunk/ Tested for Python 2.5 issue1767370 is a separate issue that can be fixed later -- keywords: +patch nosy: +techtonik versions: +Python

[issue1613573] xmlrpclib ServerProxy uses old httplib interface

2008-03-22 Thread Guilherme Polo
Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: There is another patch regarding the use of HTTP/1.1 for xmlrpclib at http://bugs.python.org/issue1767370. The other issue could be update with some comments from this issue and then this issue could be closed, I believe. -- nosy: +gp