[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2022-03-16 Thread Irit Katriel
Irit Katriel added the comment: cgi/cgitb are deprecated as per PEP 594, so there won't be further enhancements to them. -- nosy: +iritkatriel resolution: -> wont fix stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2014-02-10 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión : -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pyth

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2014-02-03 Thread Mark Lawrence
Changes by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2012-07-21 Thread Florent Xicluna
Changes by Florent Xicluna : -- nosy: +orsenthil versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list maili

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2011-07-02 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: Now that web-sig has reached agreement on PEP , can an expert update the status of this bug? -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2010-08-26 Thread Florent Xicluna
Changes by Florent Xicluna : -- nosy: +flox versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyt

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2010-08-04 Thread David Stanek
Changes by David Stanek : -- nosy: +dstanek ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pytho

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Practicality beats purity? The patch contains an enhancement to the unit test for cgi. Provided this gets past regrtest on all platforms why can't we go for it? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2010-06-19 Thread Jean-Paul Calderone
Jean-Paul Calderone added the comment: It's not terribly productive to block a fix for this specific issue in the WSGI specification on the big pile of contentious unrelated issues. It would make sense to issue a new WSGI specification with a correction for only this issue. The rest of the W

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2010-06-19 Thread Chris McDonough
Chris McDonough added the comment: Although the current WSGI 1.0 spec (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/) still indicates that implementing the size argument to readline is not required, effectively, it is and has been for several years. Stalling on a WSGI 1.1 spec has caused a spec

[issue1573931] WSGI, cgi.FieldStorage incompatibility

2009-03-30 Thread Daniel Diniz
Changes by Daniel Diniz : -- components: +Library (Lib) -None keywords: +patch stage: -> patch review type: -> behavior versions: +Python 2.6 -Python 2.4 ___ Python tracker _