[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- assignee: ncoghlan -> ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Brett Cannon added the comment: I got overruled on the deprecation idea due to utility code like walk_packages that pkgutil contains. -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Mark Lawrence added the comment: Hardly a good start :-( From the IDLE shell. Python 3.4.1 (v3.4.1:c0e311e010fc, May 18 2014, 10:38:22) [MSC v.1600 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information. >>> from pkgutil import walk_packages >>> packages = lis

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Dropped down my priority list (it's a nice to have to make the code base a bit easier to work on, rather than something essential). -- ___ Python tracker

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Mark Lawrence added the comment: Has anyone made any progress with this issue or others referenced like #7559 or #14787 ? Regardless I'd like to help out directly if possible as I'm suffering from an acute case of triagitis :-) -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Eric Snow : -- nosy: +eric.snow ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.o

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- assignee: -> ncoghlan ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan added the comment: That sounds good, and thanks for working on this - if we can get the tests cleaned up for the 3.3 release, that will make ongoing maintenance a lot easier. -- ___ Python tracker __

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Chris Jerdonek : -- dependencies: +Refactor the create-package code in test_runpy into a helper module ___ Python tracker ___

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I'd like to work on this if that's okay. I've already written test cases for issue 7559 and issue 15299 that required creating temporary packages, so I understand the need. And I'd also like to create test cases for issue 14787, which should really be done

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Note that the problem described in #14787 will limit the scope of what can be tested. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan added the comment: The walk_packages tests should also be enhanced to ensure correctly handling of namespace packages -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Such helper functionality could also be used in the tests of unittest.TestLoader.loadTestsFromName(). See, for example, the tests proposed for issue 7559. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Chris Jerdonek : -- nosy: +cjerdonek ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pyt

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- priority: low -> normal ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mai

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Also, a second test case should be added to cover the zipimporter.zipimporter component. -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- dependencies: +"pydoc -w " writes out page with empty "Package Contents" section ___ Python tracker ___

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

New submission from Nick Coghlan : Created to record the egregious hack of relying on the test_runpy infrastructure in order to test pkgutil.walk_packages. It gets the job done, but is a really messy way of going about it. Worth cleaning up by factoring the support code out to a helper module