[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Thanks for the patch. Nice work. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset dc353953ce8b by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default': Issue 15246: Improve test coverage for collections.abc.Set. (Contributed by James King). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/dc353953ce8b -- nosy: +python-dev __

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

Changes by Raymond Hettinger : -- assignee: -> rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

James King added the comment: How about a working test instead? Let me know if it looks right. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26267/set_abc_coverage.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Can you attach the failing tests for __and__? -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker ___ ___ P

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: +rhettinger, stutzbach stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

New submission from James King : I'm working on increasing the line-coverage of the tests for the Set ABC in the collections.abc module. I encountered something a little funky IMO that I'm not sure is an issue or bug... but the __and__ method passes a generator object to the constructor of th