[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2013-03-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: This is now fixed, with 1.0.0k and 1.0.1d -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Should I then open another issue just to track that bug? Have you > even tried using build_ssl.py *without* Perl? The changes required to > get that to work seem fairly extensive. The 3.3 tree works fine for me without Perl, I'm confident that changing the

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth added the comment: I forgot to add that with the patch the comment wrt Perl is truly correct. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth added the comment: OK, I have discovered my issue(s) building OpenSSL. When I first downloaded the openssl-1.0.1c external, the timestamps for the .asm files ended up being older than their corresponding .pl sources therefore triggering the rules in the makefile. I then decided

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth added the comment: Should I then open another issue just to track that bug? Have you even tried using build_ssl.py *without* Perl? The changes required to get that to work seem fairly extensive. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Again: installing Perl should not be necessary. That it is currently necessary is a bug in the sources. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth added the comment: In addition to the fixes from issue15102, the only way I could get the ssl project to build successfully was to add the Perl installation (C:\Perl\bin) to my PATH. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth added the comment: I would suggest trying to build OpenSSL (build_ssl.py) *without* Perl installed. On Windows (7,64-bit at least) a dialog box pops up many times asking which program to use to run XXX.pl. This is using the externals from svn.python.org. -- nosy: +jeremy.

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-13 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: The comment is correct. The sources are not. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-12 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith, loewis ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: h

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-12 Thread Jeremy Kloth
New submission from Jeremy Kloth : The comment regarding a Perl installation not being required is no longer true with regards to OpenSSL 1.0+ (at least 1.0.0j and 1.0.1c). A Perl script(s) is used to generate source files within the generated Makefiles. I would suggest to remove the outdated